Jump to Navigation

Search:

Securities Litigation

California Securities and Investment Fraud Litigation Attorneys

California Securities Fraud Class Actions Lawyers

The accomplished lawyers at Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP, (PSW) have recovered millions of dollars for investors and municipalities in litigation over fraudulent stock transactions, investment fraud and broker misconduct. We are a nationally recognized force in class action lawsuits and complex financial fraud litigation.

From our Los Angeles and San Francisco law offices, we represent investors throughout California and nationwide. Call us at (877) 391-8300 if you suspect you have been a victim of investment fraud or harmed by the conduct of your broker.

What Is Securities and Investment Fraud Litigation?

A securities or investment fraud lawsuit alleges that a company or brokerage firm did not follow rules established by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) or other federal and state laws when soliciting or managing investments. While investment fraud arises in a number of contexts, the most common situations in these types of litigation include:

  • Breach of fiduciary duty owed to investors
  • Broker fraud (unsuitable investment recommendations)
  • Investment fraud (ponzi schemes)
  • Misrepresentation of material facts in offering documents
  • Misrepresentation of financial results (financial statement fraud)
  • Accounting malpractice
  • Market manipulation
  • Insider trading
  • Unauthorized stock trading

For a more complete discussion of common securities litigation issues please see our pages on:

Securities Class Actions and the PSLRA

Securities Arbitration

Private Placements (Regulation D Offerings)

Hedge Funds

Structured Investment Products

Venture Capital Investing and JOBS Act

SEC Whistleblower Cases

Our securities lawyers have had notable success in class actions and individual cases involving sophisticated scams, many perpetrated with the help of accounting and auditing professionals. If your claim arises from an investment account maintained at a brokerage firm, you may be required to arbitrate your claim with a FINRA appointed arbitration panel. PSW attorneys have years of experience representing investors in securities arbitration and can advise you if you suspect misconduct by your broker. 

Representative Securities Class Actions and Investment Fraud Actions

PSW has recovered millions of dollars in class actions and on behalf of investors, successfully suing major brokerage firms, accountants, directors and officers including:

  • Tripath Technology, Inc.: PSW brought an action for breach of fiduciary duty owed to creditors and shareholders against the former officers and directors of Tripath Technology Inc., a high tech public company that filed for bankruptcy in 2007. In 2011, PSW obtained a settlement that resulted in Tripath's unsecured creditors receiving over 80% of their allowed claims.
  • Morgan Keegan Closed-End Fund Litigation: PSW represents a class of investors that invested in Morgan Keegan sponsored mutual funds. In March 2012, federal district court Judge Mays sitting in the Western District of Tennessee denied in substantial part defendants' motion to dismiss the plaintiff class' complaint.
  • In re Lehman Brothers Securities and ERISA Litigation: PSW represents six California cities and counties who lost tens of millions of dollars investing in Lehman Brothers medium-term notes and commercial paper. These cases have been consolidated in Southern District of New York before Judge Lewis Kaplan. In September 2011, PSW negotiated a settlement of the California public entities' claims against Lehman Brothers former officers and directors. This litigation continues against Lehman Brothers auditors Ernst & Young as well as certain investment banks.
  • Bank of America Financial Fraud Class Action: PSW filed a class action on June 30, 2011 against Bank of America and accountant Pablo Araque for aided and abetting a fraudulent financial scheme that targeted Spanish speaking investors in Los Angeles. The complaint alleges that Juan Rangel orchestrated the fraudulent scheme through a company known as Financial Plus Investments, Inc. Rangel pleaded guilty in October 2010 to one count of mail fraud and one count of money laundering. In February 2011, he was sentenced to 22 years in federal prison for the Ponzi scheme. The lawsuit is brought on behalf of approximately 700 investors in Financial Plus Investments, Inc.
  • Homestore.com Inc.: On behalf of Homestore.com's shareholders, the California Teachers Retirement Fund, we obtained a $90 million settlement from the internet-based real estate company for falsified financial statements and accounting irregularities. In a follow-up class action lawsuit, PSW attorneys secured a $17.5 million settlement from Homestore.com's accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers, for its part in the auditing scheme that artificially increased Homestore.com's profitability.
  • Charles Schwab & Co.: As lead counsel in a class action against Charles Schwab & Co., PSW attorneys obtained a $2.7 million settlement for unfair maintenance and termination fees that were not properly disclosed to brokerage account holders.
  • FINRA Arbitrations: PSW lawyers have represented numerous investors in FINRA (previously NASD) arbitrations. In 2008, PSW's Senior Counsel George Trevor negotiated a multi-million dollar settlement on behalf of 25 investors who suffered severe financial losses as a result of a single broker's alleged misconduct. The settlement was obtained following 25 days of hearing and closing arguments.
  • Appellate Issues: PSW lawyers have also been in the forefront of protecting investors' rights in the appellate courts. Important decisions include Lippitt v. Raymond James, 340 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2003) (preserving investor's right to prosecute claims in state court) and Daniels v. Centennial Group, Inc., 16 Cal.App. 467 (1993) (overturning Superior Court's denial of class certification of an investor group of over 25,000 individuals).

See Notable Class Actions for more information about these and our other securities class action lawsuits. We have the ability to analyze complex securities transactions, e.g., Rule 144 restrictive stock sales, PIPE transactions and venture capital investments and as well as violations of SEC regulations, working closely with federal investigators.

Individual Shareholder Suits

PSW also represents the interests of minority shareholders who are forced out by "cram down" or other stock manipulations. Our lawyers have recovered damages for victims of hostile takeovers by demonstrating how our clients' shares were intentionally devalued, forcing liquidation.

Securities Litigation News

The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) on August 28, 2012, identified the top ten investor traps to look out for in the coming year. To review these threats, click here.

On May 18, 2012, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced further guidance on its new rules concerning Know Your Customer and Suitability of Investment Recommendations. FINRA Rules 2111 and 2090 are modeled after former NASD Rule 2310 (Suitability) and former NYSE Rule 405(1) (Know Your Customer). To read more about the new FINRA Suitability Rules, click here.

Morningstar Must Answer Complaint by Receiver for Failed Hedge Fund - A federal district judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied on August 24, 2012, Morningstar's motion to dismiss a complaint brought by a receiver of a failed hedge fund. Although the Court issued only a one line order denying the motion, the complaint raises interesting questions as to a rating agency's liability. The receiver, appointed after the SEC shut down Robert Stinson, Jr.'s STABL Mortgage Fund in 2010, alleges that Morningstar issued a five star rating to the STABL Fund in reckless disregard of numerous red flags. The complaint alleges claims for contribution for violations of Rule 10b-5 and aiding and abetting fraud and breach of fiduciary duty. The case is Schwartzman v. Morningstar, Case No. 2:12-cv-01647-BMS (E.D. PA). 

Do You Have a Securities Case?

There are many factors that determine whether you have a securities case, which we will review during your free initial consultation. If you suffered a substantial investment loss because of false or misleading earnings statements, broker misconduct or other financial fraud, contact the securities litigation team at Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP. Call us today at (877) 391-8300.

Notable Cases

Acer Vista Notebook Class Action Lawsuit
Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP has received preliminary approval of the Acer notebook class action settlement. Visit http://www.acerlawsuit.com/ to make a claim...

In Re Potash Antitrust Litigation
Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP as co-lead counsel for direct purchasers obtained preliminary approval of a $90 million settlement...

Tripath Technology, Inc. Litigation
Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP has been retained by the trustee of Tripath Technology and brought claims against Tripath officers and directors for breach of fiduciary duty...

Audi and Volkswagen Timing Belt Failures
Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP settled a class action with Volkswagen (VW) and Audi for timing belt failures in VW and Audi vehicles. Claims must be filed by September 30, 2008...

iPod Nano Scratch Class Action
Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP brought an action on behalf of iPod Nano owners alleging that the screen is easily scratched...

In Re: TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
PSW filed an antitrust class action and been appointed interim co-lead counsel for all direct purchaser plaintiffs of LCD screens...

More...